Skip to main content

Do your research before buying medical devices

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
Profit
As with all profitable businesses, there is a danger that we could be mis-sold a product due to overeager marketing or our own amplified fear.  When dealing with something as serious as health matters, it is, of course, sensible to take extra care.  This is why it is of paramount importance to ensure that we conduct proper research before we purchase any kind of medical device.




Regulation

Medical devices in the US are regulated by the FDA in three classes according to the potential risk posed to patients by misuse or failure.  While there is an obvious but small inherent risk in something as simple as a pair of latex gloves or gauze dressing, more sophisticated devices bring with them not only greater complexity and effectiveness but also a greater probability of potentially life-threatening mishaps.  For even when production standards are high and quality control stringent, the very fact that these devices may be trusted to keep us alive means that when a failure occurs the results will often be catastrophic.



BUY MEDICAL DEVICES



Technology

As technology develops to be more efficient, it can also engender a deeper reliance by patients, and due to this, considerably more harm when it fails.  This is especially true of internal devices such as heart pacemakers, which once implanted cannot be easily monitored for problems.  This is clearly exemplified by the case of student Joshua Oukrop of Indianapolis, the USA who passed away due to a design flaw in his internal heart defibrillator.  A flaw that was known to the manufacturer, yet never publicised until after his apparently needless death at just 21 years of age.  Following the case, it became apparent that although the same device had been implanted in many patients, removal posed possible harm to them than the determinable risk of continued use.




Malware

Further, as therapeutic apparatus becomes more interconnected, it is increasingly becoming vulnerable to outside interference.  While no injuries have so far been reported due to malware or hacking attacks, a report by a specialists for the University of Michigan in 2012 revealed that the fact most large computerised medical equipment runs on Microsoft Windows makes it frighteningly vulnerable to external attacks, or simply viruses spreading from laptops or smartphones that are innocently brought into hospitals. In addition, hospital administrators are still woefully unprepared for such eventualities and are often reticent to hire cyber-security professionals to ensure that proper safeguards against malware are properly installed and kept up to date.


                                                BUY MEDICAL DEVICES



Slow-down

Such malware or intentional attacks is not the only problem.  As the devices, and the highly-specific software required to operate them, become more complex, the threat of failure swells. It is not uncommon, for example, for foetal monitors for high-risk pregnancies to experience a dangerous slowdown in certain situations which are not fully understood, so that it is still necessary for a member of staff to monitor them continuously in operation, and regular maintenance to be required simply to keep them operational.





In conclusion, whether you are in the market as a parent for a thermometer to take your child's temperature, or as the manager of a hospital needing an advanced MRI scanner, it is vital that you conduct full and proper research into the product.

READ ABOUT POLLUTION MASKS                    reposted from RandumbPrattles



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Do your Research Before Buying a PM 2.5 Pollution Mask

With development comes pollution, and though we love the benefits of a driven and vibrant economy no one likes the side effects a major example of which is air pollution. PM 2.5 refers to particulate matter, tiny little pieces of material, below 2.5 microns across which is danger size for your lungs.   Particulate matter above 2.5 microns in diameter is still dangerous, but less so according to scientists.  These particles are so small that thousands of them will hide in this full stop. Particles this small will travel deep into your lungs because the body has no defence against particles this tiny.  One of your best options is the stay indoors, although even indoor levels may be high if the levels outside are high.  If you smoke cigarettes or use candles or cook with oil, then these activities will contribute to this PM 2.5 pollution.  The particulate matter is about 30 times thinner than a human hair and mostly originates from car exhaust in a city...

You're not Ninjas

You're Not Ninjas Apparently Discord employ ninjas. So do iTunes, on PC at least. Whatsapp prefer Ronin, but the motif holds. Facebook has pirates which is perfect as we know what pirates did wrong and why they died out. I just updated my profile on Linkedin, and rather than getting profile moderators to check it, can you guess? Yeah.  Wow. Apparently it's a thing now. Before you start whining about plurals in Japanese, I don't care. If I don't pluralize it, I'll be attacked by Nazis, which is worse. You're not ninjas, you're software developers. You spend your days tapping away at plastic and staring at radiation, you don't spend your days stopping your heart to float across an ocean inside a dead platypus with a collapsible graphite katana secreted inside your penisgina so you can sneak in through the sewer outlet and coldly remove a threat to our kind. I may be splitting hairs, but there's a difference. Oh, I added a friend on Skype, well may...

The Last Jedi review - part one

Is it a sign of a lack of mental fortitude to get angry at a movie?  Is it wrong for me to be blazing with rage at 3 am because something I watched didn't meet my expectations?  Is it okay to reboot a franchise by stealth, choosing to destroy its future for everyone and ruin the memories of the people who made it famous in the first place rather than facing the facts and admitting that you have no new ideas at all and are forced to reboot, but you are terrified you'll lose the fanbase and profit, that cowardice and dishonesty is your only option Disney, you scum? There's some bad structure there but I'm too angry to even care.  Does she look like she cares or does she have the shits like me? Luke and Leia and Chewy are in it, so it must be Star Wars.  They're trying to create a new generation of fans so the old guards are introducing the new.  Fair enough.  No problem with that.  I'm sure my nephew cheered when the Death Star was destroy...